The battle lines are drawn and one subject is waning: will history become a thing of the past?
Less able pupils are being put off GCSE by schools with an eye on league tables
Enthusiastic pupils are being denied the chance to take GCSE history because teachers fear entering them for a tough subject will affect the school’s league table position.
And many pupils are being turned off the subject by “dud” and “duffer” teachers, new research reveals. This could mean that history, like Latin and classics, eventually becomes the preserve of private schools.
Only 30 per cent of 14-year-olds currently choose to study history at GCSE. And Ofsted has observed that “history is playing … an increasingly marginal role in the wider curriculum”.
So academics from East Anglia and Southampton universities conducted focus groups and individual interviews with 61 teachers, collecting detailed data from schools in the south west and east of England to determine the factors that influence whether pupils study history.
Many teachers reported that pressure to improve exam results meant less able pupils were being discouraged from taking the subject.
“Pupils’ interests were not necessarily put first,” the researchers said. “For the senior leadership team in some schools, the first priority was the school’s examination profile.”
History was often in competition with as many as 25 other subjects, and many schools did not require pupils to take a humanities subject at GCSE at all.
Most teachers felt the move towards specialist secondaries had adversely affected history, with pupils pressurised into taking subjects that supported the school’s specialism: “The comparative scarcity of humanities specialist schools … meant that history tended to lose out.”
But the quality of individual teachers also had a significant effect on take-up of GCSE history.
One of the teachers interviewed said: “It is crucial to have a teacher who can motivate and engage pupils in the subject. You can’t afford to have a dud.”
Another commented: “The kids are fairly shrewd. They’re not going to take a risk if they know they might get a duffer taking them.”
Some history departments deployed tactics to appeal to pupils choosing their GCSE options. One head of history spoke of putting “your best team out for Year 9”.
Another regularly listed for pupils the number of high-flying company directors who hold history degrees.
But, the researchers concluded, the future of history remained uncertain.
“Concern has been expressed that history might go the same way as Latin and classics and become primarily the reserve of the private school system,” they said.
t.haydn@uea.ac.uk
SUBJECT UNDER FIRE
- Less able pupils put off taking history by teachers worried about league tables
- Increased emphasis on vocational education
- Increased government emphasis on the core subjects: English, maths and science
- History is in competition with as many as 25 other subjects
- Pupils are often encouraged to take subjects that support a school’s specialism and there are relatively few humanities specialist schools
- Pupils are reluctant to pursue a subject that is perceived to have dull or mediocre teachers.
Related content:

1 average rating |

Comment (3)
And yet out in the real world, history has never been more popular.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
15:03
12 June, 2009
susan33
History is one of the six subjects necessary at A-Level to get into the Russell Group of Top 20 universities. (The others are English Literature, MFL, Mathematics, Physics and Chemistry)
It is a proper academic subject, so a lot of schools are under pressure to offer less challenging subjects like 'Business', 'Media' and 'ICT' and so on, because of the English league table system which puts some schools under pressure to 'dumb down' their curriculum offerings.
History teachers are leading the way in developing new learning, using multimedia, ICT, the web and other exciting styles of learning.
Plainly obvious therefore, that the only thing of the past is the perception of modern schooling that is held by the dusty professors at some second-class universities and rentaquote hacks!
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Rating:
18:33
12 June, 2009
cantona
I used to work in an academy in London, and as I was leaving I had to rank every pupils in year 8 as a A, B or a C. A, means that they could get an A or a B at GCSE. Therefore History appeared on their option forms. The B category was pupils who were borderline C/D. The C meant that they were predicted grades G to D. Neither categories B or C, had History on their option forms! They were encouraged to take other less rigorous subjects. Eventhough I had known students previously predicted Ds and Es get outstanding results, who went on to do exceptionally well at A-level, and some even went on to do History at university.
Which left me with about 25 pupils out of 100 who could take History if they decided they wanted too. However, most wanted to take Music Technology or Hair and Beauty, as they were more exciting or easier.
What was most upsetting was the case of one student, with a range of learning difficulties. He loved History, and orally he was phenomenal. He always had his hand up, and was a real asset to class discussions, offering insightful and complex answers. He was put in Category C, and was therefore being guided down a different pathway. He was devastated that he would not be able to take History in Year 9-11. His mother rang the school, and explained that it was likely whatever course he was entered into, he would be unlikely to either pass or do very well in, so why couldn't he at least take a subject that he enjoyed. So he could continue enjoying school, and leave in 3 years time with fond memories. The plea fell on deaf ears and the boy was placed in some random BTEC or GNVQ course taught by some bland paper pushing academy drone who was being shipped in to "sort" the school out of failing pupils and failing teachers.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
8:43
16 June, 2009
LS1980