Skip to main content
article icon

'Assessment only' route into profession

News | Published in TES Newspaper on 5 February, 2010 | By: Kerra Maddern

Union fury as QTS is made available to those without teacher training

Thousands of school workers will be allowed to qualify as full members of the teaching profession without undertaking any teacher training, the Government has announced.

Classroom staff, many of whom frequently fulfil the role of a teacher, will now be eligible for Qualified Teacher Status simply by providing evidence of their chalkface skills as part of the new route into the profession being prepared by the Teacher Development Agency for Schools (TDA).

Among the groups most likely to benefit are so-called "instructors" - those employed for their specialist knowledge in areas such as PE, design and technology, or music, but who have not been through formal training. Others likely to apply will be independent school staff, who are more likely not to be formally qualified, and further education lecturers.

The move will open up the possibility of lecturers running the government's 14-19 diplomas.

It is unclear how much experience will be required to qualify. However, the TDA said it would be open to graduates working in schools.

Only Gloucestershire University currently runs a scheme of this type, but its candidates must receive training in schools.

There are around 27,800 instructors without QTS, representing 6.2 per cent of the workforce. The number includes 11,400 overseas-trained teachers. Unqualified teachers earn a minimum of £15,461 compared with a starting salary for qualified teachers of at least £21,102.

NASUWT general secretary Chris Keates said the TDA has failed to "present any rationale" for the changes. It risks undermining other courses and damaging the "integrity" of teaching training, she warned.

"Although it is incumbent on all publicly funded institutions to offer value for money, I do not believe that this should be done by deciding that the award of QTS can be delivered in a cut-price fashion," she said.

James Noble Rogers, chief executive of the Universities Council for the Education of Teachers, said it would be a "disaster" if the new route leads to a "dumbing down".

John Bangs, head of education at the NUT, said: "This route must only be open to experienced teachers who have taught for an agreed minimum period in both their home country and in England.

"It should not be a means by which higher-level teaching assistants and other support staff who have undertaken some 'specified work' can gain QTS without full and appropriate training, however much classroom experience they might have."

A TDA spokeswoman said the consultation it had carried out on the proposal had helped "efforts to ensure effective quality assurance and assessment rigour and take proper account of relevant qualifications and experience".

'There must be loads of people in the same situation as me ... I'm lucky to have got on the course'

Shamin Mussa of Gunnersbury Catholic School for Boys in Brentford, Essex, has a post-compulsory PGCE that qualifies her to teach in sixth form and further education colleges, but not pupils aged under 16.

However, the 24-year-old now expects to remedy this anomaly by qualifying as a full teacher through the TDA's new route into the profession (see main story).

"There must be loads of people in the same situation," she said.

"It (the TDA route) is helping a lot of people. I'm lucky to have got on the course. It's helping a lot of people."


Subscribe to the magazine

as yet unrated

Comment (1)


  • Just goes to show that the Government has been lazy in monitoring the education system ................... !!!!!!!!!! so many without QTS!!!!!!!!.... teaching our children?

    This is YET ANOTHER.... FAST TRACK STRATEGY ....to rectify what they should have been insisting on all along only QTS in front of every class.

    Recommendations and guidlines from Government are not enough to ensure things are being done properly.... consistent REGULATION IS WHAT IS NEEDED
    Backtracking stinks and for those of us that have worked hard for QTS recognition and for those NQTs just embarking on their Masters (a requirement for all NQTs to achieve within 5 years) its an insult to elevate others through experience only AND experience that has never been assess (OR HAS IT....... what HAPPENED WHEN OFSTED VISITED...was this picked up, was it deemed acceptable, OR WERE ALL THOSE without QTS given time off for study when OFSTED CAME.
    SOUNDS LIKE EVEN OFSTED over looked the issue of non QTSs teaching in schools


    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Add your comment

Subscribe to the magazine
Join TES for free now

Join TES for free now

Four great reasons to join today...

1. Be part of the largest network of teachers in the world – over 2m members
2. Download over 600,000 free teaching resources
3. Get a personalized email of the most relevant resources for you delivered to your inbox.
4. Find out first about the latest jobs in education