Skip to main content
article icon

Heads call for less rigidity over exam choices

News | Published in TESS on 23 November, 2012 | By: Elizabeth Buie

Secondary heads have urged the Scottish government not to be too rigid in its guidance to schools on when pupils can choose their exam subjects

The plea was prompted by a speech to the School Leaders Scotland annual conference last week by minister for learning Alasdair Allan, when he appeared to close off the option of pupils making their subject choices in S2.

“It is clear that, to deliver the full range of young people’s entitlements, options for further study should not be prematurely cut off before the end of S3,” said Dr Allan.

“This means, and Education Scotland has been clear on this point, that arrangements for choices in S1 to S3 should not narrow options for the senior phase, and should not involve traditional subject choice for all young people in a cohort at or before the end of S2.”

SLS general secretary Ken Cunningham told TESS he was delighted to hear the minister elsewhere in his speech reaffirm the primacy of appropriate courses for youngsters that led to open pathways for future career advancement.

But he added: “Where we have a problem is where it becomes rigid in the interpretation of that, so that choices are made at the end of S3 only.”

Keir Bloomer, one of the original architects of Curriculum for Excellence, recently warned that pupils risked narrowing their subject choice too early under certain structures. Others in the sector have cautioned privately that forcing pupils to do only five subjects in S4, for example, could make some lower-uptake subjects unviable and lead to workforce planning issues.

Mr Cunningham said: “We are wary that a rigidity in approach will cause problems down the line in terms of subject choice. It could be that the intention of broadening out the curriculum ends up doing the opposite.”


Subscribe to the magazine

as yet unrated

Comment (2)

  • HTs are only bowing to Council pressure to cut costs and not following Education Scotland guidelines and having options at the end of S2 and again at the end of S3 and reducing from 8 S grades to 6 National will mean fewer staff nmeeded in schools so councils can cut costs.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

    15:18
    23 November, 2012

    unclebas

  • Agree with the above poster. More and more teachers are starting to view CfE as the primarification of secondaries to save staffing costs.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

    15:25
    23 November, 2012

    cochrane1964

Add your comment

Subscribe to the magazine

Related articles

More Articles

Join TES for free now

Join TES for free now

Four great reasons to join today...

1. Be part of the largest network of teachers in the world – over 2m members
2. Download over 600,000 free teaching resources
3. Get a personalized email of the most relevant resources for you delivered to your inbox.
4. Find out first about the latest jobs in education

Images