Skip to main content
article icon

‘Extravagant’ expenses and £393K ‘irregularities’

news | Published in TES magazine on 17 May, 2013 | By: Richard Vaughan

The academy chief taken to task by an official report

A culture of “extravagant” expenses, “prestige” venues and first- class travel at one of Britain’s biggest academy chains has been laid bare by a report containing many examples of financial mismanagement.

An official investigation into the E-Act group - which runs schools that have opted out of local authority control - has revealed that hundreds of thousands of pounds of public money was also spent on unapproved consultancy fees.

The report, seen exclusively by TES, comes as the movement to grant schools greater autonomy grows around the world. As the number of academies continues to snowball in England and the number of charter schools in the US also rises, Australia and New Zealand are about to follow suit with similar policies.

Opponents have raised concerns about insufficient scrutiny when schools are given more freedom. Just last month, an audit of a charter school in Cleveland, Ohio, led to charges of corruption, theft and money laundering totalling more than US$1.8 million (£1.2 million).

The damaging findings for E-Act have been revealed in a report by the UK government’s Education Funding Agency, which criticises Sir Bruce Liddington, who resigned as director general of the organisation last month.

Sir Bruce, a former principal, was knighted for turning around Northampton School for Boys. He then became England’s schools commissioner, playing a key role in the expansion of the academies programme. But his time at E- Act, which he joined in 2009, was beset by controversy over pay and expenses. In 2010-11, he received almost £300,000 in wages and pension contributions, making him one of the best-paid people in education. He stepped down from E-Act after it was revealed that the academy chain had become the first to be given a financial “notice to improve” by the Education Funding Agency.

“Expenses claims and use of corporate credit cards indicate a culture involving prestige venues, large drinks bills, business lunches and first- class travel all funded by public money,” the agency’s report said. It added that expense and card payments by senior managers had “occasionally stretched the concept of propriety and value for money. Controls have been lax and some payments have tended to extravagance. However, we found no evidence of fraud.”

The report questioned the composition of E-Act’s board: a significant proportion of trustees were paid either as chairs of governors at E-Act schools or as consultants, which breaches the rules of the Charity Commission for England and Wales.

Officials from the UK government’s Department for Education investigated the chain in 2010 over claims that its directors were living the “high life”, but the probe proved inconclusive, with E-Act providing “satisfactory assurances”.

Mary Bousted, general secretary of the Association of Teachers and Lecturers union, said that the department would be asked serious questions about its capacity to police academy sponsors, and described the actions of E-Act as “immoral”.

“(Sir Bruce) had his cards marked but he carried on. Despite having been given a warning, he felt he could continue to use taxpayers’ money to fund a champagne lifestyle,” Dr Bousted said. “It was money that should have been spent on improving the education of what are very poor kids.”

One source close to E-Act said that Sir Bruce saw the organisation as “his empire with his rules”. But its chair, Ann Limb, stressed that the chain had gone through a change of culture since his departure, with an overhaul of internal processes and major alterations to the governance and make-up of the board.

Dr Limb, who became chair of E-Act last year, said that the organisation had moved into a “very different gear”. “We have put in place a very robust action plan,” she added. “When I joined, I recognised that there needed to be a great deal of improvement and so we have instigated a complete governance review as well as a restructuring.”

The finance director, appointed under the previous leadership, is also being replaced and a number of trustees have stepped down. Since Sir Bruce’s resignation the chain has taken on four more academies, bringing the number of schools that it manages to 35.

On announcing his resignation, Sir Bruce said that he was “thrilled” at how quickly the academies programme and E-Act had grown.

A Department for Education spokesperson said: “Academies cannot hide from their responsibilities - all their accounts must be externally audited and they are held to account by the Education Funding Agency, so any issues of impropriety are immediately investigated. That is exactly why the (agency) has written to E-Act requiring them to take swift action to improve financial management, control and governance. We are monitoring the situation closely and will take any further action necessary.”

Footing the bill

The Education Funding Agency’s findings:

  • A total of £393,000 was spent on “procedural irregularities” including consultancy fees, breaking E-Act’s own financial rules, £237,000 of which was spent by Sir Bruce Liddington.
  • Expenses indicate a culture of “prestige” venues, large drinks bills, business lunches and first-class travel, all funded by public money.
  • “Extravagant” use was made of public funds for an annual strategy conference, at a cost of almost £16,000.
  • Monthly lunches took place at the Reform Club, a private members’ club in London.
  • Boundaries between E-Act and its trading subsidiary E-Act Enterprises became “blurred”. A number of activities undertaken by the subsidiary were paid for with public funds.


Photo credit: Alamy

Original headline: ‘Extravagant’ expenses, ‘prestige’ venues and £393K on ‘irregularities’

Subscribe to the magazine

5 average rating

Comment (8)

  • I wonder how many more academy chains have been doing something similar? What will the government do? Will they take these schools back under local authority control as they have been poorly run? I very much doubt it.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

    Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    17 May, 2013


  • What this article doesn't mention is that E-Act academies were previously run as Edutrust which was also criticised for financial mismanagement, leading to the resignation of Lord Bhatia. How many times are they allowed to get away with this.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

    17 May, 2013


  • So this is Gove's new vision of education management?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

    20 May, 2013


  • Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

    20 May, 2013


  • I would suggest that this is the tip of the iceberg.I wonder if 38 degrees would blow the whistle as the ConDems wont as it lines their mates pockets.
    Echoes of previous privatisations where power has corrupted. The scandal is that we are allowing this cynical syphoning of public (our) money away from the learning and teaching of our young people.

    The worry is that the last time this country had a big reforming ed sec she became the longest served PM.
    Actually Gove as PM makes Farage look a credible alternative Gawd elp us!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

    20 May, 2013


  • Perhaps the Telegraph should investigate this with the same vigour it applied to the expenses scandal and publish findings. Parents would then know the truth about 'academies' and not believe Mr Gove's rhetoric.
    janehelen asks "How many times are they allowed to get away with this" - as long as privilaged individuals are in charge.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

    21 May, 2013


  • I work in an EACT school- we are constantly resource poor in our dep- as our kids - some of the poorest in the country in fact.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

    3 February, 2014


  • I worked in an E-ACT Academy, taken over by them in 2009. Despite working very hard, literally all of the original teaching and support staff of the school were "quietly" made redundant, while their jobs were taken up by supply teachers, many of them unqualified. There were staff who'd done 20 or more years there who got their marching orders. Career's were destroyed. The Academy predictably went into special measures! It was never about the children's education. The Executive Principal who engineered the insidious redundancies was on £147,000. He has since moved to another school - to do it all over again!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

    19 October, 2014


Add your comment

Subscribe to the magazine
Join TES for free now

Join TES for free now

Four great reasons to join today...

1. Be part of the largest network of teachers in the world – over 2m members
2. Download over 600,000 free teaching resources
3. Get a personalized email of the most relevant resources for you delivered to your inbox.
4. Find out first about the latest jobs in education