Skip to main content
ADD TO TES PRO

Smoking & Alcohol - What am I?

Overall rating 4 out of 54.2 (5 ratings)

Last updated 11 August 2013, created 28 November 2010, viewed 3,859

Worksheet useful as revision tool/ assessment of understanding of the chemicals in cigarettes, the diseases they cause, the effects of alcohol/smoking on the nervous system.

Downloads and web links

  • for pupils

  • Word documentWorksheet
    Smoking alcohol what am i.doc (33kb, Word document)
Need help viewing resource files?

Classification

Reviews (5)

Please provide a rating.

Add a review
Cancel
Comment Report or delete comment Rating

Fantastic resource. Ignore the ranter below, their actions say enough. Well done, will use this resource.

from ladyofthestorm, 11 August 2013
(report comment) 5 out of 5

haha the funniest rant i have read on here, good worksheet too.

from bryan mcconnell, 07 February 2012
(report comment) 5 out of 5

A fantastic resource, which can be used to educate children of the dangers of drinking, smoking or taking drugs, it is certainly a tool i will be using.

from TeacherTasker, 24 January 2011
(report comment) 5 out of 5

Excellent resource... Don't know what the last rater is on about as they haven't really rated the RESOURCE

from srenton88, 11 December 2010
(report comment) 5 out of 5

They have created a fear that is based on nothing’’ World-renowned pulmonologist, president of the prestigious Research Institute Necker for the last decade, Professor Philippe Even, now retired, tells us that he’s convinced of the absence of harm from passive smoking. A shocking interview. What do the studies on passive smoking tell us? PHILIPPE EVEN. There are about a hundred studies on the issue. First surprise: 40% of them claim a total absence of harmful effects of passive smoking on health. The remaining 60% estimate that the cancer risk is multiplied by 0.02 for the most optimistic and by 0.15 for the more pessimistic … compared to a risk multiplied by 10 or 20 for active smoking! It is therefore negligible. Clearly, the harm is either nonexistent, or it is extremely low. It is an indisputable scientific fact. Anti-tobacco associations report 3 000-6 000 deaths per year in France ... I am curious to know their sources. No study has ever produced such a result. Many experts argue that passive smoking is also responsible for cardiovascular disease and other asthma attacks. Not you? They don’t base it on any solid scientific evidence. Take the case of cardiovascular diseases: the four main causes are obesity, high cholesterol, hypertension and diabetes. To determine whether passive smoking is an aggravating factor, there should be a study on people who have none of these four symptoms. But this was never done. Regarding chronic bronchitis, although the role of active smoking is undeniable, that of passive smoking is yet to be proven. For asthma, it is indeed a contributing factor ... but not greater than pollen! The purpose of the ban on smoking in public places, however, was to protect non-smokers. It was thus based on nothing? Absolutely nothing! The psychosis began with the publication of a report by the IARC, International Agency for Research on Cancer, which depends on the WHO (Editor's note: World Health Organization). The report released in 2002 says it is now proven that passive smoking carries serious health risks, but without showing the evidence. Where are the data? What was the methodology? It's everything but a scientific approach. It was creating fear that is not based on anything. Why would anti-tobacco organizations wave a threat that does not exist? The anti-smoking campaigns and higher cigarette prices having failed, they had to find a new way to lower the number of smokers. By waving the threat of passive smoking, they found a tool that really works: social pressure. In good faith, non-smokers felt in danger and started to stand up against smokers. As a result, passive smoking has become a public health problem, paving the way for the Evin Law and the decree banning smoking in public places. The cause may be good, but I do not think it is good to legislate on a lie. And the worst part is that it does not work: since the entry into force of the decree, cigarette sales are rising again. Why not speak up earlier? As a civil servant, dean of the largest medical faculty in France, I was held to confidentiality. If I had deviated from official positions, I would have had to pay the consequences. Today, I am a free man. Le Parisien

from tronschaser, 29 November 2010
(report comment) 1 out of 5
Report a problem with this resource

Contributed by

Claire-bear 88"s avatarClaire-bear 88

Specialist subjects
Science
Statistics
This user has contributed 54 resources which have been viewed 319,921 times.
Follow
Most popular resources by this author